top of page

HOW TO MAKE MILLIONS BEFORE GRANDMA DIES

  • Writer: Long Vu
    Long Vu
  • 7 days ago
  • 4 min read

I. The Price of Love in a World That Counts Everything:

In an era where emotions are quantified in emojis and care is compressed into brief video calls, How to Make Millions Before Grandma Dies arrives like a quiet whisper, gentle but devastating. Directed by Pat Boonnitipat, the Thai film tells the story of M, a young man who quits his job to look after his terminally ill grandmother, not out of devotion but greed. Yet beneath its simple premise lies one of the most profound meditations on love, aging, and the human cost of capitalism in recent Asian cinema.


The film doesn’t ask how to make millions. It asks what we lose when we try.


II. The Layers of Storytelling: Love, Guilt, and the Currency of Time:

At first, M represents the contemporary youth, restless, pragmatic, and quietly disillusioned. Like many in Thailand and across Asia, he is caught between generations: his grandmother’s world, where family is sacred and time is cyclical, and his own, where time is monetized and life moves in fast-forward. The decision to care for his grandmother in exchange for inheritance reflects more than selfishness; it mirrors how modern societies have commodified even the most intimate bonds.


Yet as the story unfolds, the film dismantles this moral decay with tenderness. The longer M stays with his grandmother, the more he becomes entangled in rituals of care that transcend money — spoon-feeding her rice, wiping her brow, learning her habits. Each act of service chips away at his cynicism, teaching him that love isn’t about transactions but about attention.


The grandmother, portrayed with quiet brilliance by Usha Seamkhum, embodies an entire generation that loves without language. Her stoicism, a refusal to say “I love you,” echoes the cultural restraint common in Southeast Asian families, where affection is expressed through action, not words. When she silently watches TV with her grandson or shares a simple meal, the space between them becomes sacred, filled with what’s unspoken but deeply understood.


III. When Small Moments Carry Immense Weight:

In one of the film’s most memorable sequences, M hesitantly feeds his grandmother after she becomes too weak to eat. The moment is awkward, clumsy, even transactional at first, a grandson performing his duty. But the camera lingers: the trembling spoon, the sound of the clock, the reflection of the two in the metal tray. There’s no dialogue, only silence and breath.


This is where Boonnitipat reveals his mastery. The feeding transforms from obligation into intimacy, reminding us that care is an act of humility, one that reverses the roles of giver and receiver. In broader social terms, it critiques how Southeast Asian societies often see caretaking as a burden rather than a privilege, a perspective distorted by modernization and economic migration.


Grandma’s obsession with the lottery threads through the film, a quiet irony, since both she and M chase luck while ignoring the true fortune before them: each other. When M finally wins the lottery near the end, the moment feels hollow. The victory doesn’t matter anymore because the one he hoped to impress is slipping away.


This is where the film transcends cultural specificity. In every modern nation, whether Thailand, Vietnam, or America, we live in a world that glorifies sudden success while forgetting the slow, quiet art of connection. The film’s message is almost Buddhist in its simplicity: attachment to wealth blinds us from enlightenment, which in this case is love itself.


IV. Cultural Context: The Asian Heartbeat Beneath the Story:

The film’s emotional resonance comes from its deeply Southeast Asian sensibility — the idea that love is practical, patience is virtue, and duty is the language of care. Thailand’s wai khun yai (respect for grandmother) tradition mirrors similar values in Vietnam’s hiếu thảo or Japan’s oya kōkō, yet Boonnitipat dares to ask whether these values can still survive in a globalized, digital world.


In cities like Bangkok, Hanoi, or Seoul, young people are pulled toward material independence while their elders cling to ancestral values. This generational divide isn’t just emotional, it’s architectural. High-rise apartments replace shared homes, nursing facilities replace family care, and time once spent together is outsourced to convenience. The film doesn’t moralize this change, but it mourns what’s lost: the tenderness that binds generations.


Moreover, the movie subtly critiques how Asian societies often equate success with financial stability rather than emotional fulfillment. M’s transformation from greed to empathy is also a social commentary, a call to redefine what “making millions” truly means. It’s a question that extends far beyond Thailand: how do we measure worth in societies built on sacrifice and endurance?


V. Final Reflection: What the Film Teaches Us About Life and Society:

How to Make Millions Before Grandma Dies is not just a film about death, it’s a film about the living, and how we choose to spend our finite time. It holds a mirror to a world that has mistaken efficiency for meaning. When the grandmother finally passes, M doesn’t cry over lost inheritance; he cries over lost time, the one thing no wealth can buy back.


In a broader sense, the film speaks to a collective crisis in modern civilization: our disconnection from the very people who built the foundations we stand on. Whether in Thailand, Vietnam, or anywhere touched by capitalism’s cold breath, we are all M — chasing something, forgetting someone.


But there’s still hope. The film’s final scene, with M sitting quietly in his grandmother’s empty house, doesn’t feel tragic. It feels human. It suggests that understanding, even when it comes too late, is still a form of redemption.


VI. The Real Millions:

Pat Boonnitipat’s masterpiece reminds us that life’s worth isn’t determined by what we accumulate, but by what we give away — our time, our attention, our care. The “millions” we make before our loved ones die aren’t in currency, but in the moments we choose to be fully present.


And perhaps that is the ultimate inheritance: not property, not wealth, but the understanding that to love someone, truly, is to stay — even when there’s nothing left to gain.


ree

Comments


ROOTS

AND

REELS

Stay Connected with Us

Single choice
I agree to the terms & conditions
bottom of page